Thursday, June 20, 2019

Virtual Learning


Virtual learning has been around for years and continues to make headway. I have completed several online classes and have a clear understanding of how distance learning works. As an elementary/middle school educator, I have heard about ACCESS (of course from some of the high school teachers within my district), but I did not have a clear understanding of exactly what it is and how it works. As I read the chapter and completed my research for module 3, I learned several things about virtual learning, especially ACCESS and Edgenuity. I will highlight a few.
The first thing that I learned was that students decide to take virtual classes for other reasons outside of AP credit. Some of those reasons consist of having the flexibility to leave school early for work, other extenuating circumstances, and just the opportunity to take classes that would not have been available to you within the school building. According to Morgan (2016), “Virtual schools also help students take classes they would otherwise miss due to extenuating circumstances. Roblyer (2006) discusses several examples of students desperately needing an online program to graduate” (pg. 74).
Proponents by Lisa Lavender

Secondly, I learned that there are states that allow students to complete an online course for a fee; however, they will not provide the grade for the student. The numerical grade must come from the students’ school system. For example, GeorgiaVirtual School (GAVS) and Florida Virtual School (FLVS) will allow students from outside of their state to complete an online course. The last thing that I learned was that students who are incarcerated can complete online courses to receive their diploma and/or continue their education.
Virtual learning has many benefits; however, there are a couple of things I find concerning. As I completed my research, I could not find any clear data that shows the effectiveness of virtual learning as it relates to student performance. Morgan (2016) states, “Critics object to the rapid growth of online programs in K–12 settings because of insufficient evidence about its effectiveness” (pg. 74).  Another area of concern is the effect virtual learning has on students with disabilities. Many students with disabilities need the social aspect that comes with the traditional face-to-face classroom. I am confident that improvements and consistent evaluations are coming. Simonson, Smaldino, & Zvacek (2015) states, “As distance education in the United States increases in importance, evaluation will continue to be a critical component of the process of improvement” (pg. 318). I really like the Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick’s evaluation approach because it focuses more on the student (Learning, transfer and results). When taking a close look at levels 2-4, instructors should be able to see what adjustments need to be done to make sure the conditions for learning are present within the virtual classroom.
Overall, I have gained a lot from this module, but I still have a question about how a teacher’s schedule looks when he/she teaches a traditional and virtual class. How does the planning time look for them? 
References
Morgan, H. (2016). Online instruction and virtual schools for middle and high school students: Twenty-first -century fads or progressive teaching methods for today’s pupils? Clearing House, 88(2), 72-76.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (6th ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

[Yvette Sands]. [2019, Mar 3]. Online education students with disabilities [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyx3Fwl6BEA.

1 comment:

  1. You have brought out some key issues from this module about virtual learning. Most teachers are not aware of all the mandated guidelines regarding virtual learning. I have numerous personal experiences with ACCESS and Edgenuity, but I have a preference towards ACCESS. ACCESS courses provide more of the face-to-face interaction. Many view ACCESS as a program where students take classes not offered in their high school, but the truth is much broader. Students take them for multiple reasons, so ACCESS is most time a course of choice. There are many regulations associated with ACCESS with instructors getting continual training to improve the program. I have concerns about the quality of assessments in virtual learning that doesn't use ACCESS. Assessments and evaluations are a critical part of a successful class. The teacher and student need feedback (Simonson, Smaldino, & Zvacek, 2015). Programs like Edgenuity do not give the feedback from a certified teacher. It also doesn't require students to produce anything other than a multiple choice test. ACCESS requires students to take all assessments with a proctor/facilitator. They also require discussions & documents in the course to measure content knowledge.

    The future of K-12 distance learning may be a concern for many, but the face-to-face instruction is present in ACCESS virtual learning. My desire is that more schools continue to promote ACCESS courses to students on a regular basis. Students need to learn the social interaction, but they will need to understand how to manage an LMS as well as academic time management.

    Simonson, M. R., Smaldino, S. E., & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Charlotte, NC: IAP, Information Age Publishing.

    ReplyDelete